social_judgment_theory
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| social_judgment_theory [2016/05/11 23:00] – hkimscil | social_judgment_theory [2017/06/07 23:53] (current) – [Readings] hkimscil | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| * 메시지 혹은 정보에 대한 판단은 받아들이는 그 정보에 대한 개인의 앵커(기준, | * 메시지 혹은 정보에 대한 판단은 받아들이는 그 정보에 대한 개인의 앵커(기준, | ||
| * 개인 태도의 위치가 연속선상에 있는 점으로 표현할 수 있을 정도로 고착적인 것은 아님((Hovland, | * 개인 태도의 위치가 연속선상에 있는 점으로 표현할 수 있을 정도로 고착적인 것은 아님((Hovland, | ||
| - | * 오히려 | + | * 아래의 표(ordered alternatives questionnaire)를 이용하여 개인의 위치를 파악함 |
| + | * 또한 | ||
| * 수용 영역(latitude of acceptance) | * 수용 영역(latitude of acceptance) | ||
| * 거부 영역(latitude of rejection) | * 거부 영역(latitude of rejection) | ||
| * 무개입 영역(latitude of non-commitment) | * 무개입 영역(latitude of non-commitment) | ||
| * 위의 영역이 자아관여(ego involvement)와 결합하여 태도변화에 역동적인 영향력을 줌 | * 위의 영역이 자아관여(ego involvement)와 결합하여 태도변화에 역동적인 영향력을 줌 | ||
| + | * 간단히 말해, 효과적인 메시지 디자인은 청자가 어떤 위치(stance)에 있는지를 파악함으로써 가능함. 이 위치와 메시지 내용의 관여정도가 수용/ | ||
| - | ====== Readings ====== | + | |< 70% 70px >| |
| - | * Hovland, Carl I.; Sherif, Muzafer (1980). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Westport: Greenwood. ISBN 0313224382. [[amazon> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | |< 70px >| | + | |
| ^ Ordered Alternatives Questionnaire | ^ Ordered Alternatives Questionnaire | ||
| | | //Read each statement, and put a next to the statement with which you most agree. Then circle the letter of all statements with which you agree, and put an X through all statements with which you disagree.// | | | //Read each statement, and put a next to the statement with which you most agree. Then circle the letter of all statements with which you agree, and put an X through all statements with which you disagree.// | ||
| Line 26: | Line 24: | ||
| + | [[http:// | ||
| + | The topic is ” Should We Increase Teacher Pay?” The range of positions one could take on this topic might look something like this: | ||
| + | - It is absolutely essential from all considerations that teachers’ pay should be increased. | ||
| + | - It almost certain from many angles that teachers’ pay should be increased | ||
| + | - It is highly probable that things would be better if teachers’ pay was increased. | ||
| + | - It is possible that it would be better if teachers’ pay was increased. | ||
| + | - It is difficult to say whether teachers’ pay should be increased. | ||
| + | - It is possible that it would be better if teachers’ pay was not increased. | ||
| + | - It is highly probable that teachers’ pay should not be increased. | ||
| + | - It is almost certain from most angles that teachers’ pay should not be increased. | ||
| + | - It is absolutely essential from all consideration that teacher’s pay not be increased. | ||
| + | . . . . The implication of this principle is direct. Judgment is crucial to persuasion. If you offer positions that people judge as “reject, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Readings ====== | ||
| + | * Hovland, Carl I.; Sherif, Muzafer (1980). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. Westport: Greenwood. ISBN 0313224382. [[amazon> | ||
| + | {{tag> | ||
social_judgment_theory.1463007621.txt.gz · Last modified: by hkimscil
