c:mrm:2019:schedule
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| c:mrm:2019:schedule [2019/06/03 08:30] – [Week 14: Some Others (Clustering, Social Network Analysis…) (June 3, 5)] hkimscil | c:mrm:2019:schedule [2019/06/03 08:52] – [Week 13: Some Others (Clustering, Social Network Analysis…) (May 27, 29)] hkimscil | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 488: | Line 488: | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| ==== Assignment ==== | ==== Assignment ==== | ||
| - | * 자기 조의 연구주제 확정하고 | ||
| - | * 주제와 관련된 선행연구 조사, 정리하기 | ||
| - | * 이와 관련지어 연구문제 혹은 가설을 확정하기 | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| ===== Week 13: Some Others (Clustering, | ===== Week 13: Some Others (Clustering, | ||
| <WRAP half column> | <WRAP half column> | ||
| - | Quiz at the first class of the week 14. | + | Quiz at the second |
| ==== Concepts and Ideas ==== | ==== Concepts and Ideas ==== | ||
| Line 509: | Line 506: | ||
| <fc # | <fc # | ||
| __강의 내용__ | __강의 내용__ | ||
| - | * from [[# | + | * from week 2 (social science and theories) |
| - | * Sampling . . . | + | * 4가지 이론적 접근방법들 |
| - | * Research Question | + | * 소개된 이론들 |
| - | * Hypothesis | + | * decoy effect |
| - | * Conceptualization | + | * the third person effect |
| - | * 지표, 차원 | + | * the elaboration likelihood model |
| - | | + | * cognitive disorder |
| - | * NOIR | + | * agenda setting |
| - | * Lickert | + | * etc. |
| - | * Semantic Differential | + | * sampling |
| - | * 쌍대비교척도 | + | * introduction to the social networks analysis |
| - | * Reliability | + | |
| - | * Validity | + | * Hypothesis |
| - | * Research Design | + | * Conceptualization |
| - | * Survey | + | * Level of measurement: |
| - | * Experiment | + | * NOIR |
| + | * Lickert | ||
| + | * Semantic Differential | ||
| + | * 쌍대비교척도 | ||
| + | * Reliability | ||
| + | * Validity | ||
| + | * <del>Research Design</ | ||
| + | * <del>Survey</ | ||
| + | * <del>Experiment</ | ||
| + | * Research ethics | ||
| + | * 강의내용 | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 559: | Line 566: | ||
| * describe how you are going to get the data | * describe how you are going to get the data | ||
| * measuring the concepts and ideas (if necessary) | * measuring the concepts and ideas (if necessary) | ||
| + | * Analyses | ||
| + | * discuss how you are going to analyze the data | ||
| + | * discuss anticipating results and | ||
| + | * articulate how they are important in terms of this line of reserach works | ||
| + | * References | ||
| + | * list references in APA style format | ||
| + | * you should also cite articles (in the assignment body) in APA style (please refer to the https:// | ||
| please refer to the below articles | please refer to the below articles | ||
| - | * {{:spiral of silence study eg.pdf|이슈 특성과 지각된 의견분위기 상황에 따른 침묵의 나선효과}} | + | * 권혁남. (2018). 이슈 특성과 지각된 의견분위기 상황에 따른 침묵의 나선효과. 사회과학연구, |
| </ | </ | ||
c/mrm/2019/schedule.txt · Last modified: 2019/06/05 07:25 by hkimscil