cognitive_dissonance_theory
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
cognitive_dissonance_theory [2015/09/09 09:46] – hkimscil | cognitive_dissonance_theory [2015/09/09 10:41] – hkimscil | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
- Humans are sensitive to inconsistencies between actions and beliefs. | - Humans are sensitive to inconsistencies between actions and beliefs. | ||
* According to the theory, we all recognize, at some level, when we are acting in a way that is inconsistent with our beliefs/ | * According to the theory, we all recognize, at some level, when we are acting in a way that is inconsistent with our beliefs/ | ||
- | |||
- Recognition of this inconsistency will cause dissonance, and will motivate an individual to resolve the dissonance. | - Recognition of this inconsistency will cause dissonance, and will motivate an individual to resolve the dissonance. | ||
* Once you recognize that you have violated one of your principles, according to this theory, you won’t just say "oh well". You will feel some sort of mental anguish about this. The degree of dissonance, of course, will vary with the importance of your belief/ | * Once you recognize that you have violated one of your principles, according to this theory, you won’t just say "oh well". You will feel some sort of mental anguish about this. The degree of dissonance, of course, will vary with the importance of your belief/ | ||
- | |||
- Dissonance will be resolved in one of three basic ways: | - Dissonance will be resolved in one of three basic ways: | ||
- Change beliefs | - Change beliefs | ||
Line 39: | Line 37: | ||
* Festinger, L. (1956). When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of A Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World, by Leon Festinger, Henry Riecken, and Stanley Schachter. Harper-Torchbooks, | * Festinger, L. (1956). When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of A Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World, by Leon Festinger, Henry Riecken, and Stanley Schachter. Harper-Torchbooks, | ||
+ | |||
+ | . | ||
{{1964_When_Prophecy_Fails_Festinger.jpg? | {{1964_When_Prophecy_Fails_Festinger.jpg? | ||
A headline, " | A headline, " | ||
+ | |||
- | - | ||
- | Festinger and his colleague found that people didn't change their attitudes toward the beliefs even after the prophecy failed. . . . | + | Festinger and his colleague found that people didn't change their attitudes toward the beliefs even after the prophecy failed. . . . |
Make people quit smoking? (public health campaign) | Make people quit smoking? (public health campaign) | ||
- | How would you design the message (information) to // | + | How would you design the message (information) to // |
- | -- By addressing mortality problem, health problem, social stigma associated with smoking in order to change the person' | + | |
- | -- Will they stop? | + | |
- | -- If yes, people would not have started smoking in the first place . . . . | + | |
- | == Cognitive Dissonance == | + | ====== Cognitive Dissonance |
- | __Boring experiment__ | + | ? |
- | | + | : |
+ | : Those who got paid one dollar showed more positive attitudes toward the experiment -- //It was interesting. . . .!// | ||
- | Those who got paid one dollar showed more positive attitudes toward | + | ? __Theory__ |
+ | : This is the feeling people have when they "find themselves doing things that don't fit with what they know, or having opinions that do not fit with other opinions they hold" (Festinger, 1957, p.4). | ||
- | __Theory__ | + | < |
- | This is the feeling people have when they "find themselves doing things that don't fit with what they know, or having opinions that do not fit with other opinions they hold" (Festinger, 1957, p.4). | + | Individuals use cognitive structures for organizing new information -- **Schemata**. When new information is **inconsistent** with the cognitive structures that have been built previously, **dissonance** occurs. |
- | + | ||
- | [[Attachment(ProcessOfCognitiveDissonance.jpg,width=400,caption="Process of Cognitive Dissonance", | + | |
A state of dissonance = A state of disequilibrium | A state of dissonance = A state of disequilibrium | ||
Line 71: | Line 72: | ||
//There should be no speed limit on the highway.// vs. //Fat people should not be discriminated.// | //There should be no speed limit on the highway.// vs. //Fat people should not be discriminated.// | ||
- | Core of the theory posits that: | + | Core of the theory posits that: Discomfort caused by dissonance **motivates** (opinion, behavior) change. |
- | Discomfort caused by dissonance **motivates** (opinion, behavior) change. | + | -> This is the point where persuasive communication occur. |
- | -> This is the point where persuasive communication occur. | + | -> Persuader focuses on inconsistency while providing new behavior that allow for consistency or balance. |
- | -> Persuader focuses on inconsistency while providing new behavior that allow for consistency or balance. | + | |
+ | ? __Belief__ | ||
+ | : It is important to give back to the community. | ||
+ | : I have been blessed with good fortune. | ||
+ | : People who have good fortune should share it with other. | ||
+ | : The only way the community will prosper is if we all do our share. | ||
- | {{| | + | ? __Attitude__ |
- | __Belief__ | + | : |
- | It is important to give back to the community. | + | |
- | I have been blessed with good fortune. | + | |
- | | + | |
- | The only way the community will prosper is if we all do our share. | + | |
- | __Attitude__ | + | |
- | I like to volunteer my time for the good of others. | + | |
- | __Behavior__ | + | |
- | I tutor at the Literacy center twice a month. | + | |
- | |}} | + | |
- | === Assumptions === | + | ? __Behavior__ |
+ | : I tutor at the Literacy center twice a month. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Assumptions | ||
* Human beings desire consistency in their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. | * Human beings desire consistency in their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. | ||
CDT suggests that human being has a such nature to make things consistent (in their mind). (Attribute based perspective) | CDT suggests that human being has a such nature to make things consistent (in their mind). (Attribute based perspective) | ||
- | * Dissonance is created by psychological inconsistencies. | + | * Dissonance is created by psychological inconsistencies. Inconsistency should occur in one psychological state (rather than logical state) |
- | | + | * Dissonance is an aversive state that drives people to action with measurable effects. People do not enjoy dissonance state; it is an uncomfortable state. |
- | * Dissonance is an aversive state that drives people to action with measurable effects. | + | * Dissonance motivates efforts to achieve consonance and efforts toward dissonance reduction. People do something in order to achieve consonant state. |
- | | + | |
- | * Dissonance motivates efforts to achieve consonance and efforts toward dissonance reduction. | + | ===== Concepts |
- | | + | ? |
- | === Concepts === | + | : |
- | __Magnitude of dissonance__ | + | |
- | There are degrees of discomfort -- not all dissonance is created equally. | + | |
- | This magnitude are affected by three factors: | + | |
- | 1. **Perceived importance** : refers to how significant the issue is. | + | |
- | 1. **Dissonance ratio** : the amount of consonant cognitions relative to the dissonant ones. The proportion of incongruent idea. | + | |
- | 1. **Ability to justify** (rationalize) : If you have more ability to justify the in-congruency, | + | |
- | 1. **Perception** : | + | |
- | a. Selective exposure | + | |
- | a. Selective attention | + | |
- | a. Selective interpretation | + | |
- | a. Selective hold of information | + | |
- | === Persuasion === | + | This magnitude are affected by three factors: |
+ | - **Perceived importance** : refers to how significant the issue is. | ||
+ | - **Dissonance ratio** : the amount of consonant cognitions relative to the dissonant ones. The proportion of incongruent idea. | ||
+ | - **Ability to justify** (rationalize) : If you have more ability to justify the in-congruency, | ||
+ | - **Perception** : | ||
+ | - Selective exposure | ||
+ | - Selective attention | ||
+ | - Selective interpretation | ||
+ | - Selective hold of information | ||
+ | ===== Persuasion | ||
// | // | ||
- | __Buyer' | + | __Buyer' |
* After spending more than you feel okay with on a new home, car, vacation, on a woman or some other luxury item, you have to rationalize your spending. | * After spending more than you feel okay with on a new home, car, vacation, on a woman or some other luxury item, you have to rationalize your spending. | ||
* Sellers and real estate agents make phone calls (and do other things) to convince (or provide) the buyers to think that the decision was excellent. Realtors encourage buyers to make a pro and con list -- then, lead them to put something like gourmet kitchen, Jacuzzi tub, breathtaking views, etc. This lead is an effort to let buyers reduce any dissonance that may occur. | * Sellers and real estate agents make phone calls (and do other things) to convince (or provide) the buyers to think that the decision was excellent. Realtors encourage buyers to make a pro and con list -- then, lead them to put something like gourmet kitchen, Jacuzzi tub, breathtaking views, etc. This lead is an effort to let buyers reduce any dissonance that may occur. | ||
Line 121: | Line 118: | ||
__B oomerang effect__ | __B oomerang effect__ | ||
* If you create too much dissonance, the buyers (people) may decide to avoid the information or even dislike you, instead of changing their behavior. | * If you create too much dissonance, the buyers (people) may decide to avoid the information or even dislike you, instead of changing their behavior. | ||
- | |||
- | ---- | ||
- | CategoryTheory | ||
cognitive_dissonance_theory.txt · Last modified: 2016/04/19 09:14 by hkimscil