elaboration_likelihood_model
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
elaboration_likelihood_model [2015/09/09 09:29] – hkimscil | elaboration_likelihood_model [2020/05/20 08:43] (current) – [Seven types of peripheral cue uses] hkimscil | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===== Central route ===== | ===== Central route ===== | ||
+ | <WRAP column 45%> | ||
* Also referred to elaborated route. | * Also referred to elaborated route. | ||
* Centrally routed message include: a wealth of information, | * Centrally routed message include: a wealth of information, | ||
- | * '' | + | * e.g., Political messages (during each election season) are usually filled with elaborated and presumably rational information regarding the candidate' |
- | * Centrally routed messages are much more likely to create | + | * Centrally routed messages are much more likely to create |
- | * Centrally routed messages are successful in long-term change | + | * Centrally routed messages are successful in long-term change |
- | * The target must be highly | + | * The target must be highly |
- | * e.g., If you are ''' | + | * e.g., If you are **not** willing to sit for two hours straight for the televised political debate between presidental candidates, then ELM suggests that you do not have the motivation required to process an elaborated messsage. |
- | * The target must be ''' | + | * The target must be **able** to process the message cognitively. |
* You are willing to sit in front of television set for two straight hours. But, you do not understand the terms and ideas exchanged between the candidates in the debates, the effects would not happen. | * You are willing to sit in front of television set for two straight hours. But, you do not understand the terms and ideas exchanged between the candidates in the debates, the effects would not happen. | ||
- | * '' | + | * //both// **motivation** and **ability** are crucial factors for the elaborated message. |
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 45%> | ||
+ | 중요한 가정 | ||
+ | * 정교화 동기 | ||
+ | * 정교화 능력 | ||
+ | </ | ||
===== Types of Elaborated Aruguments ===== | ===== Types of Elaborated Aruguments ===== | ||
- | Elaborated argument (message) can be measured as ''' | + | Elaborated argument (message) can be measured as **strong, neutral, weak** argument. |
__Strong arguments__ create a positive cognitive response. The ideas in the message (sender' | __Strong arguments__ create a positive cognitive response. The ideas in the message (sender' | ||
- | * This type of argument | + | * This type of argument |
- | * create long-term attitude change that would result in ''' | + | * create long-term attitude change that would result in **predictable** behavior. |
* Repetition is thought to have a reinforcing effect -- enhancing the persuasive effect of strong arguments. | * Repetition is thought to have a reinforcing effect -- enhancing the persuasive effect of strong arguments. | ||
Line 29: | Line 35: | ||
===== Peripheral route ===== | ===== Peripheral route ===== | ||
- | | + | <WRAP column 45%> |
+ | | ||
* e.g., Political campaign . . . . It is common for presidential candidates to air 30-second commercials that focus on portraying feel-good images of their " | * e.g., Political campaign . . . . It is common for presidential candidates to air 30-second commercials that focus on portraying feel-good images of their " | ||
* Also, some candidates use celebrity endorsements, | * Also, some candidates use celebrity endorsements, | ||
- | * When audience is unmotivated or unable to process an elaborated message, persuaders should focus on quick and easy ways to produce change. But, this method leads only to ''' | + | * When audience is unmotivated or unable to process an elaborated message, persuaders should focus on quick and easy ways to produce change. But, this method leads only to **short-term** change, if any change at all. |
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 45%> | ||
+ | * 매직존슨의 커밍아웃과 AIDS에 대한 태도 | ||
+ | * 유명인 = 매직존슨 | ||
+ | * 지속적인 태도 변화가 이루어지지 않음 | ||
+ | * 연구대상지원: | ||
+ | </ | ||
===== Seven types of peripheral cue uses ===== | ===== Seven types of peripheral cue uses ===== | ||
- | | + | <WRAP column 45%> |
- | * '' | + | <WRAP box> |
+ | * //**Authority**//: The persuader uses authority (or authority figure) to convince the audience to accept the beliefs or behaviors. Parent may use this strategy -- "Clean up the room because I said so!" This message would work for a while; but may not have a long-term effect. | ||
+ | * {{https:// | ||
+ | * //**Commitment**//: This strategy focuses on a person' | ||
* Wearing a badge -> Putting campaign sign in your yard -> Asking to make a donation or to host a reception, etc. | * Wearing a badge -> Putting campaign sign in your yard -> Asking to make a donation or to host a reception, etc. | ||
- | | + | * Cheep and dirty: 북극곰 보호와 관련된 스티커를 보호하자는 쪽에 붙이도록 권유하고 성공하면 성금을 유도함 |
- | * '' | + | |
- | * '' | + | * //**Contrast**//: This tactic usually sets up uneven points of comparison; then ask the receiver to choose the one that persuader wants. Car sales-person may give you an expensive car that you cannot afford, first. Then, give another car that you can afford. This will give you lean toward the latter model of the car. |
- | * '' | + | * 비싼 것을 두개 보여 주고 팔만한 자동차를 선택하도록 함 |
- | * '' | + | |
+ | * //**Liking**//: Liking focus on affinity toward a person, place, or object. Advertise company uses Britney Spears to sell Pepsi or SonyoSidae to sell cellular phone. | ||
+ | * PPL 등이 그것 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * //**Reciprocity**//: This strategy presents give-and-take relationship. In supermarket, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * //**Scarcity**//: This tactic makes people worried about something. "They will be all gone in the next 10 minutes. Hurry up! Call me now. The size that fits you will disappear soon. You need to pick up the phone right now." -- Announcement in a shopping channel uses this tactic. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * //**Social proof**//: This tactic uses a kind of peer-pressure. The idea of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | <WRAP column 45%> | ||
+ | <WRAP box> | ||
+ | - 호혜성: 나한테 빚졌다. | ||
+ | - 일관성: 우리는 항상 이렇게 해 왔어 | ||
+ | - 사회적증명: | ||
+ | - 호감: 날 사랑한다면 내 생각도 좋아해 줘 | ||
+ | - 권위: 단지 내가 그렇게 하라고 하니까 해야 해 | ||
+ | - 희귀성: 물건이 몇 개 남지 않았어 | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
===== Types of Peripheral Messages ===== | ===== Types of Peripheral Messages ===== | ||
Line 54: | Line 91: | ||
: Negative message produce negative or disapproving emotional responses. If you really don't like the celebrity figure, you would hate anything that are associate with her. | : Negative message produce negative or disapproving emotional responses. If you really don't like the celebrity figure, you would hate anything that are associate with her. | ||
- | <figure>{{ ElaborationLikelihoodModel.jpg? | + | <imgcaption image1|Elaboration Likelihood>{{ ElaborationLikelihoodModel.jpg? |
- | </figure> | + | < |
+ | |||
+ | ===== To do ===== | ||
+ | * 자신이 캠페인하고 있는 상품 프로모션을 위한 메시지를 위의 ELM에 맞추어 디자인 하시오. | ||
+ | |||
elaboration_likelihood_model.1441760386.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/09/09 09:29 by hkimscil