Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- social_network_analysis_on_historical_data [2016/07/19 16:02] – [PADGETT FLORENTINE FAMILIES Study] hkimscil
+++ social_network_analysis_on_historical_data [2016/07/19 17:08] (current) – [PADGETT FLORENTINE FAMILIES Study] hkimscil
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 **__REFERENCES__**
-  * Breiger R. and Pattison P. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks, 8, 215-256. {{|PDF}}
+  * Breiger R. and Pattison P. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks, 8, 215-256. {{_cumulated-social-roles-the-duality-of-persons-and-their-algebras.pdf|PDF}}
   * Kent D. (1978). The rise of the Medici: Faction in Florence, 1426-1434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   * Padgett, John F; Ansell, Christopher K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. The American Journal of Sociology, 98 (6). {{PadgettAnsell_AJS_1993.pdf|PDF}}
 </WRAP>
 </WRAP>
 <WRAP column half>
 <WRAP box>
@@ Line 58: / Line 59: @@
 One 16×3 matrix, valued.
-BACKGROUND Breiger & Pattison (1986), in their discussion of local role analysis, use a subset of data on the social relations among Renaissance Florentine families (person aggregates) collected by John Padgett from historical documents. The two relations are business ties (**PADGB** - specifically, recorded financial ties such as loans, credits and joint partnerships) and marriage alliances (**PADGM**).
+__BACKGROUND__
+Breiger & Pattison (1986)은 르네상스 시기의 프로렌틴 지역의 가문 간의 사회적인 관계에 대한 데이터세트를 사용하여 지역사회의 가문의 역할 분석을 하였다. 실제 데이터는 존 패젯의 역사문서에서 추출한 것이었다. 두가지 종류의 데이터는 비지니스 관계와 결혼관계였는데, 전자는 (**PADGB**) 대출이나 크레딘트, 그리고 동업자 관계 등을 파함하는 금전적인 거래관계를 의미하는 것이었고, 후자는 자녀의 혼인을 나타내는 것이었다 (**PADGM**).
-As Breiger & Pattison point out, the original data are symmetrically coded. This is acceptable perhaps for marital ties, but is unfortunate for the financial ties (which are almost certainly directed). To remedy this, the financial ties can be recoded as directed relations using some external measure of power - for instance, a measure of wealth. PADGW provides information on (1) each family's net wealth in 1427 (in thousands of lira); (2) the number of priorates (seats on the civic council) held between 1282- 1344; and (3) the total number of business or marriage ties in the total dataset of 116 families (see Breiger & Pattison (1986), p 239).
+Breiger & Pattison이 지적하듯이, 원래 데이터는 대칭적으로 코딩된 것이었다. 혼인관계 데이터에 한해서는 이런 방식이 적적한 것이었지만, 금전적인 관계는 그렇지 못했다 (대개는 금전적인 관계는 비대칭적인 관계이기 마련이다). 이를 해결하고자, 이들은 각 가문의 부의 정도를 기준으로 금전적인 관계가 방향성이 있도록 하였다. PADGW 데이터는 (1) 1427년의 각 가문의 부의 측정치를 기록한 것이고; (2) 1282-1344 기간 동안의 수도원장의 숫자를 포함하였고 (3) 전체 데이터는 116 가문의 의 비지니스와 혼인관계의 숫자를 기록하는 것이었다 (Breiger & Pattison (1986), p 239).
 Substantively, the data include families who were locked in a struggle for political control of the city of Florence in around 1430. Two factions were dominant in this struggle: one revolved around the infamous Medicis (9), the other around the powerful Strozzis (15).
 **__REFERENCES__**
-  * Breiger R. and Pattison P. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks, 8, 215-256. {{|PDF}}
+  * Breiger R. and Pattison P. (1986). Cumulated social roles: The duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks, 8, 215-256. {{_cumulated-social-roles-the-duality-of-persons-and-their-algebras.pdf|PDF}}
   * Kent D. (1978). The rise of the Medici: Faction in Florence, 1426-1434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   * Padgett, John F; Ansell, Christopher K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. The American Journal of Sociology, 98 (6). {{PadgettAnsell_AJS_1993.pdf|PDF}}
+  * Economic Credit and Elite Transformation in Renaissance Florence. {{Economic Credit and Elite Transformation in Renaissance Florence.pdf|PDF}}
 </WRAP>
 </WRAP>
@@ Line 308: / Line 311: @@
 Based on his observations and analyses, Sampson divided the novices into four groups: __Young Turks__, __Loyal Opposition__, __Outcasts__, and an __interstitial group__. The Loyal Opposition consists of the novices who entered the monastery first. The Young Turks arrived later, in a period of change. They questioned practices in the monastery, which the members of the Loyal Opposition defended. Some novices did not take sides in this debate, so they are labeled 'interstitial'. The Outcasts are novices who were not accepted in the group.
+References
+  * Breiger, R., Boorman, S. & Arabie, P. 1975. An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12: 328-383. {{An_Algorithm_for_Clustering_Relational_Data_with_A.pdf|PDF}}
+  *
 </WRAP>
 </WRAP>