Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- c:mrm:2022:lecturer_note [2022/03/30 08:53] – hkimscil
+++ c:mrm:2022:lecturer_note [2022/05/09 08:34] (current) – hkimscil
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+====== 10th ======
+  * Regulatory focus theory
+    *
+====== 9th week ======
+  * Back to hypotheses
+    * Identifying variables (IV, DV, etc)
+    * Exploring measurement -->
+      * designing analysis method
+        * survey
+        * experiment
+        * observation
+        * records (artifacts)
+  * 최은혜. one-way ANOVA vs two-way ANOVA (Factorial ANOVA)
+  * 이윤정. 플로우이론과 가설의 관계
+  * 정인영. 자체에 대한 테스트
+    * 계획된 행동이론(TPB)
+    * [[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2]]
+      * 행동에 대한 태도 (attitudes toward behavior)
+      * 주관적 규범 (subjective norm)
+      * 지각된 행동<del>통제</del>제약 (perceived behavioral control)
+      * 의도 (intention)
+      * 행동 (behavior)
+    * {{https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/sb/behavioralchangetheories/Theory%20of%20Planned%20Behavior.png?600}}
+    * measuring PBC
+      * see https://www.med.upenn.edu/hbhe4/part2-ch4-measuring-constructs-perceived-behav-control.shtml
+  * 송하연. Affordance theory
+    * An “affordance” refers to the possibility of an action on an object; for instance, we say that an elevator button affords being pressed, and a chair affords being sat on. . . . [[https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/affordances]]
+    * relationship between AT (affordance) and FT (flow)?
+    * + VR (virtual world) design
+    * 좋은 affordance 가 사용자가 사용하기 편해하고 유용한 UI와 연관이 있다고 한다면 그렇다면 affordance란 어떻게 측정하는가?
+      * --> affordance
+      * [[https://montrealethics.ai/how-artifacts-afford-the-power-and-politics-of-everyday-things/|3 components of affordance]]?
+      *
 ====== 5th week ======
   * 김도휘